profile

Shouts
:-p my score on the facebook KTS II test is ENTP.

Posted May 19

Temperament
I think i may have found an idealist villain. I tried to lay out the points for hitler. let me know what you think.

Posted Mar 11

Temperament
Thank You!!

Posted Feb 26

Temperament
Send a Shout

Kelly G Willis
Personality Type:
RationalINTP Architect
Username:Keillan
Headline:Why only forty characters?
Gender:m
City:Lafayette
State:IN
Country:US
College:University of Virginia's College at Wise
Grad Year:1992
Occupation:Semi-Mad Scientist
Industry:Science/Research
Company:Bioanalytical Systems, Inc.
Title:Chemical Production Chemist
Relationship status:Married
Looking For:geocaches (when not on the computer)
Interested In:Geocaching, Where's George, Second Life, science fiction, and of course personality types.
Political Views:mostly moderate, although I tend to be a balanced-budget hawk
Religious Views:Buddhist for the most part
Preferred mail format:html
I'm just a typical semi-mad scientist working on world conquest! Actually, I'm mostly harmless. I work as a chemist and live with my wife and five (yes, five) cats. I also do my own laundry.
 
Blog
News Feed

Differences in Abstraction

Much of my blogging on here and other sites that I inhabit deals with introspection. I suppose that a large part of me has been trying to discover who I am. For example, I’m quite sure that I’m a Rational, and knowing that has helped a lot. Thus much of my self-analysis is done in a Rational manner, as if I am a thought experiment on myself. It seems to me though that searching for oneself is more the domain of the Idealist. I look at myself and see a lot of traits that lea…
Posted by Keillan on Tuesday June 10, 2008 4:35 PM

Arrogance and Temperament

Dr. Keirsey has a blog entry on the arrogance of Rationals . He sets out a decent analysis that seems to make sense. From my Architect point-of-view, I see how his hierarchy within the four Rational roles works out. Yet I suspect that arrogance is not the exclusive realm of Rationals. Any temperament can exhibit arrogance in one way or another. I’ve been thinking about how it might be read when coming from differing temperaments. This is of course speculative and certainly open …
Posted by Keillan on Thursday May 1, 2008 3:32 PM

The Evolution of Temperament

One thing that I enjoy about temperament analysis is its application to historic figures. Understanding how the Guardian George Washington had to interact with a mainly Rational Continental Congress during the Revolutionary War definitely lends a different perceptive to how Washington was ultimately fighting on several fronts. Similar analyses of the past shed light on the human experience as well. However, I have to wonder if temperaments today are actually different than in the past.…
Posted by Keillan on Friday April 25, 2008 9:17 AM

Geocaching and Temperament

When I'm not staring at a computer screen, I like to engage in an activity known as geocaching . For those unfamiliar with the activity, it is something of a hi-tech hide-and-seek/treasure hunt. The way it works is one participant hides a "geocache", some container that has a log and perhaps other items, somewhere out in the world. Then the latitude and longitude of the geocache's position are posted on the web site linked above. Other participants then seek out this container usin…
Posted by Keillan on Thursday April 17, 2008 1:38 AM

Learning to be Human

Welcome to my blog. OK, with that out of the way, down to business. From my reading on PersonalityZone, I see the basic consensus that we are born as one of the four temperaments. From birth, we are either Artisan, Guardian, Idealist, or Rational. That is, we have one of them down already. Perhaps the definition of a true human experience is to acquire traits of the other three temperaments. We'll still have our basic temperament, the one we are born with, but a balance, a complet…
Posted by Keillan on Wednesday February 20, 2008 9:59 AM
Latest News
  • The Blog of a Semi-Mad Scientist or General Delusions of Grandeur

    General Nonsense of a Semi-Mad Scientist

    I have a couple of chequing accounts that use paper cheques. Even in a world where it seems that electronic banking in the forms of credit cards, debit cards, and on-line bill pay rule, there are still those rare occasions where one is simply not able to speed negatively-charged particles posing as wealth to another party. Because of that, there is still a utility for this rather archaic means of settling debts.

    Recently my wife and I have had a few, euh, financial difficulties, leaving our bank balances on the low side. In other words, it’s life as normal where petrol is over a dollar a litre. Because of a couple of errors on my part, both chequing accounts went into the negative this week. Of course both banks have in place policies that zap a whopping Insufficient Funds (NSF) fee into our accounts, making them even more negative.

    Now, I can understand the purpose of NSF fees. Just like speeding tickets keep everyone going the lawful speed limit, NSF fees are the banks way of saying that if you owe them even a cent, they’ll come down on you like you’ll not believe, thus keeping everyone from taxing the bank’s patience. Surely they can’t have customers actually owe them money.

    If it where somehow in proportion to the negative balance, then it would be more understandable. My all-electronic chequing account at ING Direct is more or less in this category. If I overdraw my account for whatever, they treat the amount that I own as if it were a credit card balance. I have only a $25 window, but that is usually enough to cover minor emergencies and calculation errors.

    With my account at Chase Bank, I had a debit transaction that comes out on a yearly basis (which I had forgotten about) show up out of the blue. That in of itself didn’t push my account into the negative, but a few transactions that took place earlier that day that I could have waited on drove my balance to the negative. It turned out that four transactions which included two sub-dollar transfers to my savings account (moving odd cents there as a way of building up its balance) resulted in a $100 NSF fee!

    Fortunately, I was able to work with Chase and explain what happened. They were somewhat understanding and was able to waive that NSF fee. However, I have a couple of other transitions that were clearing while that was in place, and even though we had put $100 into the account, those two extra transactions resulted in a $64 NSF which I’ll have to absorb. I note with interest that if the first NSF hadn’t existed in the first place, I would have had the second one.

    Still, at least I was able to at least get a partial solution. Not so much with US Bank. An accidental $5 PayPal transaction (I clicked on a button without thinking) caused my account to go into the red. Even though I immediately sent funds from my ING Direct account to US Bank, it arrived a day late, resulting in a $35 NSF. OK, I was an idiot and likely deserve some kind of penalty, so I could live with that.

    However, what follows is rather horrific. I got there obligatory “You are an idiot” notice in today’s post, telling me that I got hit with the NSF (which I already knew). What I didn’t know was that starting on the fourth calendar day, a Continuous Negative Balance fee would be levied at the rate of $8 a day. And not just on business days, but for each calendar day! I checked my balance on-line and saw the first one of those had been levied, all resulting from going $2.85 into the hole.

    Part of the problem here is that there are no US Bank branches in town. I have that chequing account as at one time I had a credit card through the bank, plus it was a decent way of shuffle funds off to the side. (I direct deposit FSA funds there.) I rang their main number to find out how I might be able to add funds into my account to cover the negative balance ASAP. What I got was pretty much no help. They couldn’t do an electronic transfer into their bank, nor could I send any fund to them that would arrive before Monday at the earliest. Gee, so much for the power of electrons! Meanwhile, a Sunday debt would be an $8 indulgence.

    The only resort that I can see is making my way to a bank branch somewhere. Fortunately, we’ll be going to my mother-in-law’s tomorrow and a branch is about a 60-kilometre detour along our route. My plan is to give them the funds to bring my balance to zero and then close the account. Good riddance!

    One would think that with the advent of flying cars and cybernetic implants, 21st century banking would be a lot more user-friendly to mere mortals. Instead, we see something of a system that resulted in things like feudalism and other things we’d like to forget about. Along with the usury of credit cards, perhaps these marvels of modern economics will be able to build debtor’s prisons. I know, I’m probably grousing from my own stupidity, but still isn’t this how populations are divided economically? Just a thought.

wcz
nwz